teddy bear sat on chair in waiting room

The Elective Care Backlog and Ethnicity

The Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in a large fall in hospital activity such as consultations, scans, tests and operations across England leading to a huge backlog in routine hospital care with an estimated seven million patients waiting to begin hospital treatment. The report outlines how people from Asian groups, in particular, experienced a much larger fall in planned hospital care during the pandemic than people from White, Black or Mixed ethnic groups.

Background

The Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in a large fall in hospital activity such as consultations, scans, tests and operations across England leading to a huge backlog in routine hospital care with an estimated seven million patients waiting to begin hospital treatment. The report outlines how people from Asian groups, in particular, experienced a much larger fall in planned hospital care during the pandemic than people from White, Black or Mixed ethnic groups. Research shows large variations in rates of hospital care in England for different ethnic groups existed prior to 2020, but the 3.7 million drop in planned hospital procedures over the pandemic’s first two years worsened these disparities.

The methods outlined in this report provide a useful blueprint for local health systems to use in analysing and understanding their own elective care backlogs and to reduce healthcare inequalities.

 

Key Findings:

Our detailed analysis of hospital data from March 2019 to February 2022 reveals that:

    • Before the pandemic, the White group had higher rates of elective procedures overall than the Black, Mixed and Asian groups, with the White group having almost a fifth more procedures than the Asian group per head of population. Cardiac and cataract procedure rates were highest in the Asian group and dental procedure rates were highest in the Black group.
    • Procedure rates during the first year of the pandemic fell in all groups, with the NHS carrying out around 2.7 million fewer operations and tests in that year compared with the year before.
    • However, the falls in activity were not uniform across the different ethnic groups, with the Asian group experiencing the largest overall fall in the first year of the pandemic compared with the other groups (a fall of 49% for all procedures compared with 44% for the White and Black groups). This means that if the proportional fall in activity was the same for the Asian group as it was for the White group, we would have expected to see just over 17,000 more procedures for the Asian group.
    • Although the gap narrowed in the second year of the pandemic, there was still a larger deficit of care among the Asian group, with the fall remaining 2% larger for the Asian group than for the White group – an estimated
      deficit of 6,640 procedures.
    • Apart from the Asian group, consistent differences were not found across procedures for other ethnic minority groups. The Black group did have larger rate falls than the White group for cardiac and cataract procedures (the fall was 19% larger for cataract procedures) but otherwise saw similar changes to the White group, including for all procedures taken together.
    • The most deprived groups in the population experienced larger rate falls overall and for most specific procedure groups. For hip and knee replacements, there was a 13% larger fall in the most deprived group compared with the national change, and a 7% lower fall in the least deprived group.
    • There was no relationship between the fall in elective hospital activity and the local impact of Covid-19 by region (as measured by reported Covid-19 cases and Covid-19 admissions).

The quality of data available for analysis limited our findings. We renew our appeal for national and local organisations to act on the poor quality of ethnicity data and call on national policy-makers and local leaders for:

  •  Urgent action to address health care inequalities between socioeconomic and ethnic groups, including the large and unexplained falls in planned activity that occurred during the first year of the pandemic
  • National and local monitoring of changes to patient pathways (such as more tests being carried out before a patient sees a specialist) that are introduced to manage the elective backlog, to ensure disadvantaged groups are not further disadvantaged
  • Addressing the large and sustained deficit in cardiac care for the Asian group and action to understand the reasons for lower demand for elective care among the Asian population

Further work to understand ethnic variation in elective pathways for specific procedure groups, including action by national clinical audits, which will require improved ethnicity data collection and analysis.

These actions are needed to ensure that learning from the first two years of the pandemic is taken on board, as we move into the next phase of the pandemic.

Find related content

Photo of street art/mural for the NHS photo by Matthew Waring on Unsplash

REACH-OUT: Caring for the Healthcare Workforce Post-COVID-19

Research

This report, produced in partnership with the University of Leicester, the University of Nottingham, and UCL, presents the first six-monthly update on the REACH-OUT programme, outlining the rationale and methodology that will drive the work. 

teddy bear sat on chair in waiting room

The Elective Care Backlog and Ethnicity

Research

The Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in a large fall in hospital activity such as consultations, scans, tests and operations across England leading to a huge backlog in routine hospital care with an estimated seven million patients waiting to begin hospital treatment. The report outlines how people from Asian groups, in particular, experienced a much larger fall in planned hospital care during the pandemic than people from White, Black or Mixed ethnic groups.

Image of crowd

Ethnic Inequalities in Healthcare: A Rapid Evidence Review

Research

The Observatory has published its much anticipated rapid review into ethnic health inequalities across a range of areas including key priorities set by the independent health body. Ethnic inequalities in access to, experiences of, and outcomes of healthcare are longstanding problems in the NHS, and are rooted in experiences of structural, institutional and interpersonal racism. This report is the first of its kind to analyse the overwhelming evidence of ethnic health inequality through the lens of racism.